|
Description
Glossary
More
on the Web
Activities

Home
Teacher's
Page
| |
Teacher's Page
Purpose
The
quest to discover in what manner the universe operates has been given a boost in
recent years with the idea known as “String Theory.”
Giving students a way to navigate through various sites that will provide
background, visuals, extensions, and activities is the purpose of this
website. In a learning sense, I hope studying this topic helps them
develop a sense of how scientists build on previous theories, and arrive at
possible solutions to problems. Finally, it might encourage students to create
some mental images of abstract ideas, a good strategy in all areas of
learning.
Learner
Description
The
initial students for whom this program was designed are 8th graders
who have been identified as gifted in science, but any student who is intrigued
with this topic would be a potential user.
Supplies
Materials
needed include the students’ laptops, posterboard, markers, magazines, scissors, glue, the NOVA video series
called The Elegant Universe. Optional items could include overhead transparencies of the questions for
students to think about as they watch the videos, and worksheets for the five
different activities.
For the culminating activity
you might want a video camera.
Student supplies for
"A New Building Block?" activity:
- 15 foot long rope
- measuring tape
- paper clips
- stop watch
- calculator
Answer
Keys for Activities
Standards
- 8.1.1--Students
recognize and describe how scientific knowledge is subject to modification
as new information challenges prevailing theories and as new theory leads to
looking at old observations in a new way.
- 8.1.8--Students
explain that humans help shape the future by generating knowledge,
developing new technologies, and communicating ideas to others.
- 8.3.13--Students
explain that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only changed from
one form into another.
- 8.3.15--Students
can identify different forms of energy that exist in nature.
- 8.5.6--Students
explain that a single example can never prove that something is always true,
but it could prove that something is not always true.
- 8.5.7--Students
recognize and describe the danger of making over-generalizations when
inventing a general rule based on a few observations.
Evaluation
Suggestions
|
Data source
|
Purpose
|
|
Small group evaluation when the lesson is nearly
finished
|
To determine lesson effectiveness; acceptability of
the lesson; and the appropriateness of the materials and strategies
employed
|
|
Students’ final presentation grade
|
Measure instructional adequacy (i.e. determine the
extent to which the expected outcomes have been realized)
|
|
Student survey
|
Measure the adequacy of the lesson in terms of
instruction, cosmetics, program, and curriculum
|
Small Group Evaluation
Select a group of 6-8 students to try the lesson.
Students are chosen randomly from Gifted Science
Classes.
At the end of the lesson, students are given the
following questions to answer.
1.
What two previous ideas about the makeup of our universe does String
Theory possibly unify?
2.
Give one
example of something that might be possible in the future if the idea of String
Theory is true.
3.
What is
the Law of Conservation of energy?
4.
List the
six forms of energy.
5.
Give two
reasons why String Theory is not yet taught as fact.
I will collect and score the students’ answers, then
interpret their performance compared to the Goals and Objectives (State
Standards.)
In addition, I will do an informal observation of how
many questions I am asked as students work on the lesson, and which parts of the
lesson elicit those questions.
|
Lesson Page
|
# of
Questions
|
Comments
|
Home
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
Poster Activity
|
|
|
Video notes
|
|
|
Physics Activities
|
|
|
Glossary
|
|
|
More on the Web
|
|
|
Teacher
|
|
|
Evaluation
|
|
|
|
Name: _____________________
|
Date: ___________________
|
|
|
Project Title:
_____________________
|
Teacher(s): L. Warren
|
|
|
Science
Symposium Simulation
|
|

|
|
Process
|
Below Avg.
|
Satisfactory
|
Excellent
|
|
1. Has clear vision of final product
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
2. Properly organized to complete project
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
3. Managed time wisely
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
4. Acquired needed knowledge base
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
5. Communicated efforts with teacher
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
|
Product (Project)
|
Below Avg.
|
Satisfactory
|
Excellent
|
|
1. Format
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
2. Mechanics of speaking/writing
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
3. Organization and structure
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
4. Creativity
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
5. Demonstrates knowledge
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9, 10
|
|
6. Other:
|
1, 2, 3
|
4, 5, 6
|
7, 8, 9
|
|
|
Total Score:____________________________
|
|
Teacher(s)
Comments:
|
|
Powered by TeAch-nology.com- The Web Portal For Educators! (www.teach-nology.com)
|
|
Student Final Presentation
Grade
Student Survey
|
Question
|
Yes
|
No
|
Somewhat
|
Comment
|
|
Are the directions for the lesson clear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the site easy to navigate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there enough information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there too much information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was the poster activity helpful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were the video questions helpful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were the physics activities helpful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were the individual pages readable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was the design of the individual pages consistent?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did color and sound help your understanding of String theory?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did animation help your understanding of string theory?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you find spelling or grammar errors?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did this lesson fit in with our previous topic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you need more time to complete the activities?
|
|
|
|
|
Resources
Gefter, A., "The World Turned
Inside Out," NewScientist, March 20, 2004
Lemonick, M., "Before the Big
Bang," Discover, Feb. 2004
NOVA Teacher's Guide, Fall 2003, 125
Western Avenue, Boston, MA
For more information contact Mrs. Warren at lwarren@tms.cville.k12.in.us
|